Quote
Over the past quarter century,
communication technologies have spawned an explosion of ways in which “text,”
both written and electronic, has become part of the out-of-class curriculum.
This explosion has outpaced our pedagogy, our curricula and methods of
instruction, and the definitions of what it means to be literate in a
multimedia society. (One major irony in American education is that no
philosophy or pedagogy has been developed to take into account the role of
visual representation in instruction, while at the same time increasingly large
portions of the education budget are being spent on iconic technologies such as
computers, video recorders, and video cameras.) These technologies are much
more than electronic envelopes for delivering the old curriculum in a
marginally new way(Semali, 2001).
Reflection
I agree that while teachers are
encouraged to use these new technologies there is a lacking of how to use them
to their best use. When technologies and
multimedia are use just for the sake of meeting a requirement or to use a new
toy it is the students who suffer and the teacher misses an opportunity to
extend learning. When media literacy is
part of the instruction learning is extended to include a personal analysis of
the material and to form a personal view that can be used both in and outside
of the classroom. The students who are
given this opportunity have a greater sense of how to form views and the forces
that are present to steer their thinking in a particular way. I believe having good analyzing skills make
us more award of information and better citizens.
Source:
Semali, L.
(2001, November). Defining new literacies in curricular practice. Reading
Online, 5(4). Retrieved from:
http://www.readingonline.org/newliteracies/lit_index.asp?HREF=semali1/index.html
In a webpage from the John Hopkins University, School of
Education the topic of Visual Literacy
and the Classroom was discussed. This
article also agreed that the term literacy does not have a concrete definition
and there is much debate on what constitutes literacy there is a driving force
behind the debate and that is technology.
This article discuss what this means in the classroom and how the valued
skills being able to analysis written and visual message will give the student
skills that will be used outside the classroom and be carried over into society
and culture.
Riesland, E. (2010). Visual literacy and the classroom.
Retrieved from http://education.jhu.edu/PD/newhorizons/strategies/topics/literacy/articles/visual-literacy-and-the-classroom/
1. What is meant by
the term "new literacies" and give me a concrete example of how it
should change teachers' understanding of what it means to literate in the
digital age.
“New literacies” seem to have many
different meaning but it is generally means the shift from the printed world to
the use of technologies, visual messages and multimedia. I think that it is a great opportunity for
teachers to build critical thinking
skills by using multimedia examples to show how they are produced and why they
are produced. Giving a student the
chance to analyze and form their own opinion is so important in our society
today and if we can give them the skills to interpret what they are watching,
reading, listening to or viewing they will have a stepup in the world outside
school.
2.In your own words
explain what this quote means:
"In the current historical juncture of democratic decline in the
United States, ideals and images have become detached from their anchorage in
stable and agreed-upon meaning and associations and are now beginning to assume
a reality of their own. The self-referential world of the media is one that
splinters, obliterates, peripheralizes, partitions and segments social
space, time, knowledge, and subjectivity in order to unify, encompass,
entrap, totalize and homogenize them through the meta-form of entertainment.
What needs to be addressed is the way in which capitalism is able to
secure this cultural and ideological totalization and homogenization
through its ability to insinuate itself into social practices and private
perceptions through various forms of media knowledges. (p. 196)"
I think this quote means we are
presented messages that are the message that the government, political
canaditates, marketing firms and manufactures want us to hear, believe and
accept as fact without questioning.
3. What does the lack
of critical media literacy in schools create?
It creates a student
who accepts the influences of media without being able to know what the
underlying message is and how to decide if this is a view or idea they want to
accept or reject.
4. Why is
it preposterous to claim an absolute definition of " literacy"?
In the article the author Ladislaus
Semali, that while one definition would be developed and agreed upon the rapid
development and advances of technology and media would make the definition
obsolete before it could be accepted.
5. Why does this
author advocate a more critical approach to visual literacy? Do you
agree? Why or why not?
The
author favors a more critical approach to visual literacy, one that goes beyond
the impact that visuals have on individuals. Thus, for me, visual literacy
refers to multiple abilities to read, view, understand, evaluate, and interpret
visual texts including artifacts, images, drawings, or paintings that represent
an event, idea, or emotion(Semali, 2010).
I agree with his view because I think that we all need to skills to
interpret and evaluate what we are reading, listening, viewing or watching not
only to understand but to develop our own opinions, emotions and ability to
accept and use the information or reject it and file it as useless.
Good understanding of how critical media literacy supports goals is related to new literacies!
ReplyDelete